Spitfire Aircraft Parts Which Aircraft Would Win A Supermarine Spitfire Or A Bf-109?
Which aircraft would win a Supermarine Spitfire or a Bf-109? - spitfire aircraft parts
It really is not much. The Spitfire has a rate of climb is shorter and better rotation, but the Bf109 is usually faster and better diving. The planes are nearly equal. Equality is not very useful, if, if you fight only 10 minutes of fuel at a rate of, and that all the Bf109 was more than in Britain.
|
7 comments:
In general, the Spitfire, its great maneuverability, easy to fly, well, it has less firepower than the Bf109, which in England has a better resistance. Bf109 is stronger armed with cannons, machine guns, as well, but the difference is not so great. In general, the quality of the drivers would be in each of them, a factor that would win a duel.
In general, the Spitfire, its great maneuverability, easy to fly, well, it has less firepower than the Bf109, which in England has a better resistance. Bf109 is stronger armed with cannons, machine guns, as well, but the difference is not so great. In general, the quality of the drivers would be in each of them, a factor that would win a duel.
For some credit here goes to the men who led them. Even a little lower in the hands of a good well-trained pilot a victory can be the hat. Look at the Lynx vs Zero fights in the Pacific. The Wildcats scored a very impressive record of killing. And I seem to recall that the British killed more they lost the masters Spits.
It depends on the experience of the riders and the starting position. Spitfire dive had problems, the BF-109 A increased turning radius. It also depends on what each model is used. The two had several changes in their lives operitional.
Supermarine Spitfire!
Spitfire
The Spitfire in a very small margin.
It is often said that the Spitfire and the Hurricane are both outside the Bf109 in turn could. In his memoirs, says Alan Deere Spitfire pilot, it was impossible to set a Bf109 on one shift, in turn, drive defensively quickly turn the tables on a German attack to follow. However, some sources say the exact opposite, and some - but not all - also German pilots, he was the best result of the meeting. So who is right? What a difference the aircraft flown by the results of the Battle of Britain?
In comparison, there are many variables to consider. Height is a variable, such as the German machine is considered superior to higher elevations from virtually all sources. As a pilot, is another factor that is, may have been what the Messerschmitt seem less necessary in the fight for a number of reasons.
Firstly, many of the pilots, it was not structurally sound. Its wings were small and thin - so thin that emphasizes projection was necessary to house the pants of his victoryG-mounted weapons. The chassis has been mounted on the fuselage and not in the spar of the wing, it is not strong enough to contain the impact of landing, that ye resist him a dangerously narrow track. Struts tail of the aircraft has been stiffened to cure the structural problems with the engine vibration. The German appeared light and delicate, and their drivers, simply did not trust his strength, but it was more than sufficient, the weight of the aircraft as a whole. In fact, the philosophy of the entire structure of the machine, the wing had been small and thin as possible to maximum speed and maneuverability, which give her the compactness of the device in order to maintain their weight to a minimum.
Secondly, while it is approaching its limit at low speed handling, its bars automatically inserted, with a strong beat clearly audible over the roar of the engine! Although there is a considerable margin before the stagnation, once deployed, the desire to bring the majority of drivers have over their time, they thought right at the edge of the StalLing Many others were not even at this point, and uses the number of bars in the implementation, as the limit of safe operation to fly their aircraft to prevent their spread to everyone. So these tapes his handling of equipment hindered, rather than used to improve the prescribed manner. There was a lack of drivers, but as a designer, but also fly without the bars of the Bf109 is certainly less maneuverable than their opponents.
A hand path error is about the opportunity to dive Bf109 Spitfire flight. Was the beginning of the battle, the Spitfire pilot in the prosecution and considerable space was originally missed by the Spitfire had to avoid before the dive, roll cutting engine power. However, since some pilots out of ignorance or frustration, then concluded that the 109 would be built sooner or later, and when they came, until he took care to avoid the overhead of thin wings, which is a term that the real weakness. Spitfire pilots was not afraid, because theirlarge wing thickness of a sheet 'box-spring "savings conferred enormous power and could not" cut corners "By pulling the nose to the ground lost to compensate. In addition, dip into a lower level, a force play Spitifre that their performance was better in low-altitude high altitude, where the 109 had the advantage.
What we can say with certainty: Actions Bf109 and Spitfire were very narrow, with a page or in an area that is of minor importance. Although Hurricane behind their peers only in the speed, but compensated with a much higher resistance. The man who would have made the machine a big difference in the clashes between these levels.
Post a Comment